HE Higher Education Ranking — Expanded FAQ (American Ranking System)

1. What is HE Higher Education Ranking?

HE Higher Education Ranking is an institutional ranking system that evaluates the overall operation of higher education institutions (HEIs) using a structured set of criteria and key performance indicators (KPIs). The goal is to improve institutional performance across academic, research, and societal missions by measuring what institutions do and how effectively they do it. Results and guidance support improvement and internationalization across the sector.

HE Higher Education Ranking is an American ranking system. It is registered in Dover (Kent County), Delaware, USA as HE Higher Education Ranking LLC, File Number 10157263

HE Higher Education Ranking is published annually and is presented as an institutional ranking initiative associated independently.

The first edition was published in April 2023. Subsequent editions follow the annual cycle described below.

HE covers the core operating domains of an HEI—teaching and learning, faculty and research, internationalization, social and cultural impact, quality assurance, labour-market linkages, infrastructure, equity and equality, academic freedom and transparency, and innovation—captured within a structured methodology of criteria and KPIs designed to reflect institutional operation and improvement.

The methodology specifies 25 general criteria (each with its own weight) and 136 measurable KPIs distributed across those criteria.

Each of the 25 criteria carries a specific weight; its KPIs then have weights commensurate with their parent criterion. Final results aggregate KPI scores into criterion scores and then into an institutional score. (HE’s methodology page explains the weighting framework.)

No. HE is institutional, not programmatic. It compares whole institutions on like-for-like operational indicators rather than individual faculties or degree programs.

HE aims to rank the best 1,000 HEIs worldwide. The cap is designed to promote global competitiveness; HE frames 1,000 as roughly ~3% of universities worldwide, making inclusion both selective and motivational for institutional improvement.

Results are published online on the ranking website and are free and open access. HE explicitly supports open access to ranking data.

Primary stakeholders include universities and colleges; national councils and ministries; QA and accreditation agencies; funders; employers and labour-market partners; and learners and families—each using the indicators to understand performance and improvement priorities.

Institutions can contact HE through the official channels (email/LinkedIn) to express interest. Participating HEIs receive a questionnaire; their submitted data are analysed and reported in the annual release. HE also announces a data-collection window in mid-November, with results published in March/April of the following year.

HE’s core data source is the institutional questionnaire completed by HEIs. Indicators are designed to be measurable and auditable within the institutional context.

HE describes a council of experts and advisors who hold periodic meetings to safeguard originality, relevance, and value. HE also states its intent to align with good-practice frameworks such as those of IREG (Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence).

HE publishes its methodology and KPIs, and after results are released, each participating HEI receives a detailed institutional report showing submitted data, results, and guidelines/recommendations for improvement.

HE’s indicators intentionally intersect with QA/accreditation areas because improving those areas tends to improve institutional operation. While ranking, QA, and accreditation share the objective of raising standards, they differ in how they measure and validate performance: HE is an annual comparative measurement; accreditation is a formal compliance and review process; QA is an ongoing internal system of assurance.

Yes. HE explicitly states that criteria and indicators may be updated to remain relevant and useful to institutions. Changes aim to reduce burden while enhancing validity and impact.

While traditional rankings often emphasise research reputation and bibliometrics, HE’s framework stresses institutional operation and improvement across 25 criteria/136 KPIs, including governance, access, equity, and links to the labour market. This wider operational lens complements reputation-heavy systems and is designed to be actionable for QA and management. (For context on other rankings’ emphases, see examples from THE and QS.)

HE’s methodology includes items that measure adherence to UN-related recommendations on access and comprehensive development, as well as governance and funding transparency at HEIs.

Beyond public results, participating institutions receive a confidential, detailed report with their data, results, and targeted improvement guidance for the next cycle.

They can compare institutions at a general operational level (not by program) to understand the learning environment, support, and broader campus conditions reflected by the KPIs.

Policy-makers and funders can read HE’s indicators to assess local, regional, and international impact, institutional spending models, financial governance, and student aid—informing investment and policy choices.

Yes. The site lists webinars and online seminars connected to its themes (e.g., internationalization; research and rankings).

No. HE states that results and ranking data are completely free and open access.

HE is international—covering HEIs across all regions and continents.

HE’s public methodology focuses on criteria/KPIs and weighting; institutions with missing submissions may be excluded from some measures. (For specifics, institutions should refer to the current questionnaire and technical notes shared during the data-collection phase.)

Institutions communicate through HE’s official channels during and after the submission window. The detailed report provides a basis for discussion of future-cycle improvements.

HE points to expert oversight and iterative methodology development (including alignment with IREG good practice) to keep indicators relevant and balanced across education, research, governance, and societal impact—reducing over-reliance on any single metric.

The methodology is designed as a macro-enhancement tool—a practical blueprint for annual progress across teaching, research, internationalization, governance, and equity—rather than a narrow contest of prestige.

See Methodology on the HE site and the downloadable “Introduction to HE Higher Education Ranking: Methodology, Criteria, and Indicators” publication.

Use the Apply / Request Info options or the contact channels referenced on the site; HE then shares the questionnaire link and the current-cycle timeline.